Morledge, R (2011) Colleges as agents for construction innovation. Construction Innovation, 11(4), pp. 441-451. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to highlight the low level of adoption of innovative products in the UK. The paper presents a case study conducted for investigating the potential for UK further education colleges (FECs), in order to extend their existing activity and develop a role as independent centres for specialist knowledge of innovative products. Design/methodology/approach To test assumptions which had been previously published by government departments (Departments of Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform and Trade and Industry), two surveys were conducted, focusing on the level of knowledge and experience of construction small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) regarding innovative products and processes. In total, six colleges collaborated and successfully bid for funding to test their ability to deliver a wider role in the construction community. Each appointed a fully funded full-time adviser to research, collect, and diffuse information about a specific specialist area. Findings The results indicate that there is evidence of the need for independent sources of information about innovative products. The colleges have shown their ability to build knowledge and capacity to offer independent advice. The outcome however indicates that the sustainability of the role is unlikely without an effective business case and the commitment of senior college management teams. Research limitations/implications A unique agreement to collaborate was an important factor throughout this project and would be a pre-requisite to any generalisation of the model. Practical implications The provision of independent advice of this nature is not otherwise readily available in the UK for key SME suppliers (including designers, specifiers, clients, and builders). In the absence of such facilities, the barriers to innovation identified are less likely to be reduced. Originality/value The originality of the research lies in determining a new role for locally accessible FECs and a new resource for SMEs engaged in designing and delivering construction projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | college collaboration; construction industry; construction innovation; independent information; small to medium-sized enterprises; United Kingdom |
| Index terms: | evidence, methodology, collaboration, construction project, construction innovation, business case, agent, survey, builder, United Kingdom, commitment, construction community, funding, construction industry, case study, low level, designer |
| Subjects: | profession, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, practitioner, psychology, economic analysis, strategic project management, research methods, management, professional development, Geography, production management, measurement and scaling, building construction, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here