Straub, A (2011) Maintenance contractors acting as service innovators. Construction Innovation, 11(2), pp. 179-189. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to show how performance-based contracting functions as an enabler of service innovation by maintenance contractors. Design/methodology/approach - A postal survey of medium-sized maintenance employers was carried out. The questionnaire and findings were mapped and analysed combining existing models of service innovation and service quality. Findings - As a consequence of the survey, performance-based contracting maintenance companies implement innovations in their service concept, client interface and service delivery system to guarantee the quality of their services. The maintenance contractors have launched new, improved or better competing services for their own organisation. Existing services are implemented in a new environment incorporating small incremental innovations. Research limitations/implications - Maintenance companies do not solely address all business innovations as consequences of performance-based contracting. Performance-based contracting of, for example, building services may by the different nature of the maintenance strategies and activities lead to somewhat other outcomes. Originality/value - There is very little literature on maintenance contractors as service providers and service innovators. This paper provides insights in innovations by maintenance contractors as well as the needed additional knowledge and competences of the contractors acting as maintenance-engineering consultants.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | competences; innovation; maintenance |
| Index terms: | service delivery, building service, engineering consultant, guarantee, maintenance contractor, survey, strategy, service quality, questionnaire, methodology, competence, performance-based |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, practitioner, engineering systems, research methods, management, contract structure, performance measurement, personnel development, service delivery, professional |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Human Resources, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Procurement, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here