Elmualim, A and Gilder, J (2014) BIM: Innovation in design management, influence and challenges of implementation. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 10(3-4), pp. 183-199. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
The construction industry is widely being criticised as a fragmented industry. There are mounting calls for the industry to change. The espoused change calls for collaboration as well as embracing innovation in the process of design, construction and across the supply chain. Innovation and the application of emerging technologies are seen as enablers for integrating the processes 'integrating the team' such as building information modelling (BIM). A questionnaire survey was conducted to ascertain change in construction with regard to design management, innovation and the application of BIM as cutting edge pathways for collaboration. The respondents to the survey were from an array of designations across the construction industry such as construction managers, designers, engineers, design coordinators, design managers, architects, architectural technologists and surveyors. There was a general agreement by most respondents that the design team was responsible for design management in their organisation. There is a perception that the design manager and the client are the catalyst for advancing innovation. The current state of industry in terms of incorporating BIM technologies is posing a challenge as well as providing an opportunity for accomplishment. BIM technologies provide a new paradigm shift in the way buildings are designed, constructed and maintained. This paradigm shift calls for rethinking the curriculum for educating building professionals, collectively.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | BIM; design management; fm; innovation; integration and collaboration |
| Index terms: | implementation, construction industry, architect, construction manager, questionnaire, paradigm, design management, integration, building professional, emerging technology, collaboration, architectural technologist, survey, designer, engineer, design team, building information modelling, design manager |
| Subjects: | profession, data collection methods, practitioner, contractual arrangements, innovation and technology management, professional practice, management, education and knowledge transfer, design process, organizational analysis, information systems, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here