Underwood, J and Isikdag, U (2011) Emerging technologies for BIM 2.0. Construction Innovation, 11(3), pp. 252-258. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose – This paper aims to present a new perspective regarding how newly emerging ICT may have an impact on Building Information Modelling and Management (BIMM); specifically, towards enabling the next generation of (full state) BIMs. Design/methodology/approach – The paper presents a literature and technology review, and articulates a novel vision for the future of BIM. It starts with exploring how ICT has had an impact on shaping and modernising the sector, compared to the “traditional”, “archaic” and “draconian” heritage. The paper elaborates on the current interpretation of BIMM and emerging technologies that may change this interpretation from a semantic model to a full state digital building model evolving through the lifecycle of a building. Findings – The vision presented in this paper underlines the focus that BIMM is now becoming broader, as the information management paradigm shifts from enabling modelbased management of shared building information, which provides meaningful data about a building in a standardised way (i.e. BIM 1.0), to enable an integrated environment of distributed information which is always up to date and open for derivation of new information (i.e. BIM 2.0). Technologies such as cloud computing, sensor networks, stateless web services and semantic web are presented as the new facilitators of this paradigm shift. Originality/value – This paper provides value by stipulating a new vision (i.e. BIM 2.0) for BIMM and BIM (in particular) in light of emerging technologies such as cloud computing, sensor networks and semantic webs.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | buildings; information technology; modelling |
| Index terms: | cloud computing, information technology, methodology, facilitator, becoming, semantic web, building information modelling, modelling, lifecycle, emerging technology, paradigm |
| Subjects: | innovation and technology management, project delivery, analytical methods, practitioner, computing systems, philosophical process, digital infrastructure, information systems, networking, education and knowledge transfer, research methods |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here