Wandahl, S; Jacobsen, A; Lassen, A H; Poulsen, S B and Srensen, H (2011) User-driven innovation in a construction material supply network. Construction Innovation, 11(4), pp. 399-415. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose User-driven innovation (UDI) has been proven to successfully increase the value of products and services in single companies with direct linkages to the end-user. The construction material industry often has no direct linkages to the end-user, due to supply networks through builder merchants. Moreover, a lack of user knowledge is common in such networks, and companies rarely have explicit knowledge on how their products and services are in fact used and valued by their end-users. Thus, it is clear that UDI is not directly applicable to the construction material industry without further developments. Hence, the purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that a network perspective is essential when adapting and implementing UDI in the construction material industry and to let the advantages of doing so surface. Design/methodology/ approach The research design includes a number of different approaches and types of interaction between the researchers and industry. Additionally, an extensive literature review on UDI is carried out to identify variables necessary for successful adaptation to a network perspective. Findings The conclusion of this research validates that a network approach to adapting UDI in the construction material industry is a precondition for a successful innovation journey. In addition, it was concluded that by adapting the network perspective new value-adding potentials became visible, which could have a huge impact on innovation, effectiveness, efficiency, etc. in the construction material industry. Originality/value The paper adds to the body of knowledge on how to implement UDI in a supply network by developing a framework for such an innovation process. The framework has its outset in any given generic new product development model with a logical sequence of steps. However, the framework is further developed into defining the networks activities, the internal activities, and the user-oriented activities needed.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction material industry; construction materials; customers; network; user satisfaction; user-driven innovation |
| Index terms: | user satisfaction, methodology, body of knowledge, explicit knowledge, builder, literature review, new product development, effectiveness, construction material, interaction, efficiency, adaptation, linkage, research design |
| Subjects: | behavioral psychology, performance management, research methods, knowledge management, data analysis and analytics, building materials, practitioner, innovation studies, user focus, research design and methodology, client relations, business |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Quality Management, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here