The use of virtual prototyping for hazard identification in the early design stage

Chun, C K; Li, H and Skitmore, M (2012) The use of virtual prototyping for hazard identification in the early design stage. Construction Innovation, 12(1), pp. 29-42. ISSN 1471-4175

Abstract

Purpose - The construction industry is well known for its high accident rate and many practitioners consider a preventative approach to be the most important means of bringing about improvements. The purpose of this paper is to address previous research and the weaknesses of existing preventative approaches and then to describe and illustrate a new application involving the use of a multi-dimensional simulation tool - Construction Virtual Prototyping (CVP). Design/methodology/approach - A literature review was conducted to investigate previous studies of hazard identification and safety management and to develop the new approach. Due to weaknesses in current practice, the research study explored the use of computer simulation techniques to create virtual environments where users can explore and identify construction hazards. Specifically, virtual prototyping technology was deployed to develop typical construction scenarios in which unsafe or hazardous incidents occur. In a case study, the users' performance was evaluated based on their responses to incidents within the virtual environment and the effectiveness of the computer simulation system established though interviews with the safety project management team. Findings - The opinions and suggestions provided by the interviewees led to the initial conclusion that the simulation tool was useful in assisting the safety management team's hazard identification process during the early design stage. Originality/value - The paper introduces an innovative method to support the management team's reviews of construction site safety. The system utilises three-dimensional modelling and four-dimensional simulation of worker behaviour, a configuration that has previously not been employed in construction simulations. An illustration of the method's use is also provided, together with a consideration of its strengths and weaknesses.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction industry; hazard identification; health and safety; modelling; risk management; safety management; simulation; virtual prototyping
Index terms: effectiveness, risk management, early design stage, modelling, construction industry, case study, hazard identification, practitioner, configuration, methodology, virtual prototyping, simulation tool, safety management, health and safety, virtual environment, multi-dimensional simulation, construction simulation, interview, computer simulation, construction site, project management team, literature review
Subjects: health safety and environment, design process, financial risk, performance management, research methods, industry analysis, systems engineering, occupational health and safety management, practitioner, profession, risk assessment, data collection methods, virtual reality, data analysis and analytics, innovation and technology management, analytical methods, modelling and simulation, work location
Topics: Quality Management, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Site Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Roles and Professions, Risk Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here