Kissi, J; Dainty, A and Liu, A (2012) Examining middle managers' influence on innovation in construction professional services firms: A tale of three innovations. Construction Innovation, 12(1), pp. 11-28. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore some of the factors that influence innovation in construction professional services firms. The paper examines the role of middle managers who have responsibility for developing the right conditions that foster innovation at the business unit level. Design/methodology/approach - A theoretical framework was initially developed through a synthesis of the literature. Using a case study approach, three types of innovation were explored to illustrate the role and influence of middle managers in fostering and exploiting innovations. Findings - Findings from the study suggested that middle managers' innovation supporting behaviours influence innovation outcomes by helping development of a climate for innovation that influence championing behaviours among project managers. Research limitations/implications - The study was based on a single United Kingdom-based construction professional services firm. Nevertheless, the research contributes to the call for more qualitative approaches to understanding leadership research in construction. Originality/value - Limited research has been undertaken on the impact of leadership on construction innovation beyond senior managers. This paper seeks to contribute to addressing this gap in literature by highlighting the significant role that the middle managers play in enabling innovation in construction professional services firms contrary to well-publicised negative views on the middle managerial roles.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction industry; construction professional services; innovation championing; innovation outcomes; leadership behaviours; middle managers; United Kingdom |
| Index terms: | United Kingdom, manager, construction innovation, methodology, qualitative approach, case study, project manager, construction industry, construction professional |
| Subjects: | practitioner, data collection methods, profession, industry analysis, building construction, Geography, professional development, research methods |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here