Li, H; Chan, N K Y and Skitmore, M (2012) The use of virtual prototyping to rehearse the sequence of construction work involving mobile cranes. Construction Innovation, 12(4), pp. 429-446. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose - Rehearsing practical site operations is without doubt one of the most effective methods for minimising planning mistakes, because of the learning that takes place during the rehearsal activity. However, real rehearsal is not a practical solution for on-site construction activities, as it not only involves a considerable amount of cost but can also have adverse environmental implications. One approach to overcoming this is by the use of virtual rehearsals. The purpose of this paper is to investigate an approach to simulation of the motion of cranes in order to test the feasibility of associated construction sequencing and generate construction schedules for review and visualisation. Design/methodology/approach - The paper describes a system involving two technologies, virtual prototyping (VP) and four-dimensional (4D) simulation, to assist construction planners in testing the sequence of construction activities when mobile cranes are involved. The system consists of five modules, comprising input, database, equipment, process and output, and is capable of detecting potential collisions. A real-world trial is described in which the system was tested and validated. Findings - Feedback from the planners involved in the trial indicated that they found the system to be useful in its present form and that they would welcome its further development into a fully automated platform for validating construction sequencing decisions. Research limitations/implications - The tool has the potential to provide a cost-effective means of improving construction planning. However, it is limited at present to the specific case of crane movement under special consideration. Originality/value - This paper presents a large-scale, real life case of applying VP technology in planning construction processes and activities.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction operations; construction planning; cranes; mobile cranes; project planning; sequencing; simulation; virtual prototyping |
| Index terms: | virtual prototyping, project planning, visualization, construction planner, construction process, methodology, movement, construction planning, testing, site operation, module, planner, construction work, database, construction operation, construction activity, platform |
| Subjects: | building construction, data management, digital design, research methods, architectural elements, design practice, construction planning, construction operations, professional practice, innovation and technology management, operations management, practitioner, control systems, health behaviours and lifestyles, profession |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here