Akadiri, P O and Fadiya, O O (2013) Empirical analysis of the determinants of environmentally sustainable practices in the UK construction industry. Construction Innovation, 13(4), pp. 352-373. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose - During the last decade, the practice of sustainability has been gradually adopted in the UK construction industry, with the increasing interest in the discourse of sustainable development. This paper therefore aims to investigate the role and ability of sustainable development-based requirements - top management commitment, government regulations and construction stakeholder pressures - as potential determinants of adoption of proactive environmentally sustainable practices, with a view of promoting sustainable innovation in the UK construction industry. Design/methodology/approach - The research approach selected for this research comprised of a questionnaire survey of the UK construction industry practitioners - architects and designers, structural engineers, construction managers and quantity surveyors - with the aid of an Adobe Livecycle Designer. Purposive sampling techniques using maximum variation strategy were adopted for selecting the target survey respondents. The Predictive Analysis Software (PASW) Statistics 17.0 (formerly SPSS statistics) was employed to analyse information from the survey. Findings - Empirical results indicate a positive effect of government regulations, top management commitment and construction stakeholder pressures on sustainable construction practices. Government regulation was found to be the most important determinants of sustainable practices. In addition, top management commitment appears to be linked with government regulation as the defining factor increasing managers sustainability awareness, helping sustainable practices to be effectively implemented and appealing to firms. Originality/value - The research results provide useful information in understanding the determinant factors of sustainable construction innovation and are particularly essential in aiding better decision-making in implementing sustainable practices, thereby facilitating the sustainability of the construction sector.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction stakeholders pressure; environmentally sustainable practices; government regulations; sustainable construction; top management commitment; United Kingdom |
| Index terms: | statistics, purposive sampling, determinant, construction industry, architect, designer, quantity surveying, government regulation, sustainable practice, construction sector, structural engineer, variation, decision-making, top management, methodology, questionnaire, practitioner, construction manager, strategy, commitment, sustainable development, United Kingdom, survey, manager, sustainable construction, sustainable construction practice |
| Subjects: | psychology, mathematical modelling, data collection methods, risk assessment, profession, practitioner, sustainable practices, decision analysis, industry analysis, research methods, management, sustainable construction, Geography, contractual condition, health safety and environment |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Contract Administration |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here