Fu, E; Newell, D; Becker, A; Schwegler, B and Fischer, M (2013) Is adaptation sustainable? A method to estimate climate-critical construction resource capacity. Construction Innovation, 13(2), pp. 202-216. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose - Though production rates for construction materials are generally available, <IT>potential</IT> capacity on a global scale is poorly understood. Commencement of infrastructure projects to address climate change, such as dikes and levees, could increase demand making critical resources scarce. Since increasing production capacity of scarce products can be a challenge, understanding current potential capacity is an imperative. The purpose of this paper is to develop a new method to assess capacity and to create one such global estimate for cement. Design/methodology/approach - The proposed global hybrid method creates a global estimate of cement production capacity in four steps: collect capacity and production data from existing reports; select top regional capacity holders; compute regional utilisation; back-calculate capacity from production. Findings - The method overcomes shortfalls of other methods, but - like all estimating methods - is inherently limited by the amount of data available. It nonetheless provides economists, climate change scientists, government officials, investors, and other researchers a better understanding of current maximum global cement capacity. Originality/value - Most studies only focus on industry demand and actual production, because these forces drive commodity pricing. Capacity is generally estimated either through surveying goods-producing industries at the plant level or examining economic data. Methods that employ these types of analysis are useful for regional estimates of production, but are ineffective at the global scale.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | adaptation; capacity; capacity utilisation; cements; climate-critical resource; concretes; global warming; industry analysis; port infrastructure; sea level rise |
| Index terms: | investor, pricing, adaptation, industry analysis, construction material, estimate, infrastructure project, surveying, global warming, methodology, estimating, climate change |
| Subjects: | health monitoring assessment and metrics, economic analysis, financial and cost management, building materials, climate science, user focus, strategic management, infrastructure and transport systems, sociology, research methods |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here