Holt, G D (2013) Construction business failure: Conceptual synthesis of causal agents. Construction Innovation, 13(1), pp. 50-76. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose - Business failure has evolved a major research domain, both of corporate finance generally and of construction management, equally. Much of this attention has focused on assessing business 'health' to predict longevity, but less so, on causal agents of failure. The aim of this study is to synthesise published knowledge in the subject domain to explore construction failure agents. Design/methodology/approach - Extant literature drawn from both corporate finance and construction management disciplines are synthesised. Subjective, textual analysis is undertaken and causal agents thematically grouped. A failure relationship model is derived that conceptualises construction business failure in relation to its operating universe. Findings - Generic failure agents (GFA) (ordered, based on percentage frequency among the literature observed) are shown to be: managerial, financial, company characteristics, and macroeconomic. The first three are proffered to reciprocally interact within a 'universe' defined by the latter. Numerous sub-causal agents (SCA) are attributed to each generic agent. The role of innovation is suggested to hold potential negative (as well as positive) impacts on mitigating GFA and SCA. Research limitations/implications - Limitations relate to synthesis of contemporary published evidence, so a progressive iteration would be empirical study of identified agents within live construction environments. An implication is the call for research realignment; from emphasis on business health assessment, to that of root causal agents. Practical implications - Advancement of theory relating to business failure has significant implications for construction management research. Originality/value - The failure relationship model and its linkage to innovation is novel.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bankruptcy; business failure; construction; construction industry; failure agents; innovation; solvency |
| Index terms: | business failure, management research, corporate finance, agent, methodology, evidence, linkage, bankruptcy, construction industry, empirical study |
| Subjects: | research methods, industry analysis, evaluation and assessment methods, business, research design and methodology, practitioner, economic analysis |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here