Adoption of high performance building systems in hot-humid climates: lessons learned

Nahmens, I and Reichel, C (2013) Adoption of high performance building systems in hot-humid climates: lessons learned. Construction Innovation, 13(2), pp. 186-201. ISSN 1471-4175

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the adoption process of high performance building technologies, including alternative wall systems, in hot-humid climates. Challenges faced by homebuilders adopting high performance building technologies, and resulting energy performance are discussed. Design/methodology/approach - The paper is a case study of four homebuilders using high performance building technologies, including advanced framing, panelised and modular. For each homebuilder, a baseline and a demonstration house were evaluated for energy performance and technology adoption. Homebuilders were interviewed to identify implementation challenges and barriers faced during the construction process. Findings - The advanced framing, modular and panelised houses used 50 percent, 42 percent, and 35 percent less energy when compared to the traditional stick-built. Further, the modular appeared to have the greatest opportunity to boost performance for least cost. Participating builders identified cost as the top constraint to a wide adoption of high performance criteria, followed by a slow learning curve and the lack of proper marketing channels to transition from construction to sale. Research limitations/implications - Several limitations of the research restrict generalisation of findings: results are based on a small sample of homebuilders; and results reflect energy performance in a hot and humid climate. It is likely that relative energy usage will change as the size, scope, and design complexity of the common element changes. Originality/value - Findings from this study will contribute to a better understanding of the usability of high performance technologies and ease the transition towards implementing high performance criteria into every builder company's culture.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction technology adoption; energy; green buildings; housing; innovation; sustainability
Index terms: case study, implementation, energy performance, humid climate, technology adoption, construction technology, building system, marketing, usability, framing, builder, performance criteria, building technology, lessons learned, complexity, housing, methodology, construction process, green building
Subjects: engineering systems, climate science, practitioner, data collection methods, construction type, digital engineering, business, user-centered design, innovation and technology management, energy systems, contractual arrangements, conceptual models, professional development, design practice, performance measurement, research methods, systems engineering, building construction
Topics: Site Management, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here