Bashouri, J and William, D G (2014) A model for sharing knowledge in architectural firms. Construction Innovation, 14(2), pp. 168-185. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose - This theoretical paper aims to develop a model of how best to facilitate projects knowledge sharing within architectural firms to learn from lessons and improve the firm innovation capabilities, knowledge and skills. Design/methodology/approach - A conceptual framework is developed by reviewing the literature in the fields of knowledge management (KM), the project-based organisation and communities of practice (CoPs) and linking these to the literature on the architectural firm. Findings - In the architectural firm, KM strategy needs to be linked to the overall business strategy determining the balance of codification/personalisation. The firm needs to be structured as a double-knit organisation connecting projects with CoPs. This structure creates a social network that allows sharing the useful and innovative knowledge created through the design process. Success depends on building a knowledge environment, providing organisational support and building a learning architecture within projects. A balanced combination of information and communication technologies, lessons-learned, storytelling, conversational learning and dialogue are needed as knowledge sharing methods. Originality/value - This paper's originality is in constructing a conceptual framework or model for knowledge sharing within the architectural firm with CoPs at the heart of that model. This paper is valuable to any architectural practice that aims to protect its reputation, improve its performance and increase its innovative knowledge base. It is also valuable to the construction industry by helping to minimise design mistakes and the consequent cost of construction rework.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | knowledge sharing,communities of practice,knowledge management,design,architectural firm,project-based organisation |
| Index terms: | architectural practice, heart, construction industry, architectural firm, communities of practice, methodology, conceptual framework, knowledge management, knowledge base, information and communication technology, design process, social network, business strategy, rework, strategy, knowledge sharing, project-based organization |
| Subjects: | operations management, knowledge management, organization, business, computing systems, design methods, sociology, industry analysis, information systems, theoretical framing, medical science and clinical practice, management, research methods, professional development |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here