Bridge, C and Carnemolla, P (2014) An enabling BIM block library: An online repository to facilitate social inclusion in Australia. Construction Innovation, 14(4), pp. 477-492. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the implications of socially inclusive Building Information Modelling (BIM) library components. BIM requires and integrates many sets of predefined blocks or collection of attributes. Any one of the individual blocks can be replicated and/or stored in a block library for later reuse. However, few if any current block libraries contain or have access to the blocks that enable social inclusion. Design/methodology/approach - An action-based research methodology was used to design, develop and deploy three enabling blocks as part of a plan to develop a larger library of tools for BIM practitioners. The Enabling Block Library is an open access library of Australian code-compliant mobility elements published online. This paper discusses the design and development of the library components in detail, explaining how each of the three blocks was selected in our pilot evaluation and how each was identified; fact-checked; planned (designed); deployed (action); and then evaluated. Findings - The process and evaluation highlights that appropriate code-compliant design tools can support greater social inclusion aspects of a built environment project. These are tools that are relevant to the full spectrum of industry users of BIM, including designers, engineers and certifiers. Research limitations/implications - Because this paper documents the project while in an early launch phase, with a small number of launch blocks, the research results were limited in their ability to thoroughly measure industry or educational impact. However, the results showed how a socially inclusive BIM block library can be developed and why this is important, with literature supporting the potential of its dissemination to the design and construction industry. Originality/value - The paper applied action-based research methodology in the development, deployment and evaluation of exploratory BIM use to create more socially inclusive environments. It is of value because it facilitates designers creating the optimum of performance-based accessible environments, rather than the minimum “deemed to satisfy” Building Codes.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | design and construction,Australia,BIM,building,it design,whole life cycle |
| Index terms: | building information modelling, whole life cycle, mobility, design and development, engineer, Australia, designer, research methodology, built environment, design and construction, social inclusion, dissemination, methodology, practitioner, documents, building code, performance-based |
| Subjects: | practitioner, profession, research design and methodology, contractual arrangements, Geography, professional development, design process, knowledge translation, sustainability assessment, performance measurement, research methods, regulatory law, infrastructure and transport systems, information systems, sociology |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Ethics, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Legal Issues, Design Practice, Sustainability, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Information Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here