Hung, C Y and Cheng, E W L (2014) Estimating contractors' efficiency with panel data: Comparison of the data envelopment analysis, Cobb-Douglas and translog production function methods. Construction Innovation, 14(3), pp. 274-291. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose - This paper aims to explore the use of the data envelopment analysis (DEA), Cobb-Douglas and translog production function methods in estimating contractors' efficiency. Design/methodology/approach - In this paper, the DEA, translog and Cobb-Douglas methods were used to estimate the technical efficiency of 23 contractors in Hong Kong from 2003 to 2009. For this research, four input and three output variables were identified. Findings - The results suggest that the efficiency scores obtained from the DEA method were significantly different from those obtained from the translog and Cobb-Douglas methods, while the efficiency scores from the translog method were similar to those from the Cobb-Douglas method. The DEA method further reveals that the company had poor utilisation of its resources over the past few years. On the output side, the current ratio was too small, implying that the company suffered from excess current liabilities relative to its current assets. Research limitations/implications - Application of efficiency measurement in the built environment is still in its infancy. The current research, therefore, calls for more research to be undertaken to establish the applied literature base for the construction industry. Practical implications - The DEA method helps the inefficient company explore ways to improve the utilisation of the inputs as well as the process and to maximise the outputs. Originality/value - Knowing the relative performance of contractors helps understand their competitiveness in the construction industry. By estimating their technical efficiency, contractors can improve the conditions for enhancing performance.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | management,construction management,estimating,efficiency |
| Index terms: | methodology, estimating, liability, built environment, competitiveness, construction industry, data envelopment analysis, estimate, Hong Kong, efficiency |
| Subjects: | Geography, research methods, performance management, liability law, infrastructure and transport systems, industry analysis, market analysis, financial and cost management, data analysis and analytics |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Legal Issues, Urban Studies, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here