How to monitor people 'smartly' to help reducing energy consumption in buildings?

Spataru, C and Gauthier, S (2014) How to monitor people 'smartly' to help reducing energy consumption in buildings? Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 10(1-2), pp. 60-78. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

There is a complex link between building fabric, habitant expectation and behavior, energy consumption and actual internal conditions. Home owners exert total control of their homes and how people actually use buildings is not as how we think they do. Therefore, mapping occupants' behavior, and understanding how it relates to comfort and energy consumption is essential. To address this necessity, the paper reviews techniques and systems used to monitor occupants through time and location. Furthermore, it assesses the complexity, robustness, accuracy and performance of each method. To support this review, monitored data were collected using various methods to monitor people's activities in their home. These could be supported by fix building sensors, or/and wearable sensors. Results from these studies established that systems, using ultra wide band technology and radio-frequency identification hold the highest precision and accuracy, being a non-intrusive method in everyday domestic settings. In conclusion, gathering occupancy data may lead to better and more energy-efficient control system of indoor environment.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: energy demand reduction; non-intrusive monitoring system; occupancy patterns; user location and tracking
Index terms: energy demand, indoor environment, accuracy, owner, comfort, control system, energy consumption, wearable sensor, monitoring, mapping, complexity
Subjects: environmental science, energy systems, control systems, systems engineering, occupational health and safety management, sociology, monitoring and control, computer vision, professional development, spatial and geospatial analysis
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Site Management, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here