Occupants' behavioural impact on energy consumption: 'Human-in-the-loop' comfort process control

Zeiler, W; Vissers, D; Maaijen, R and Boxem, G (2014) Occupants' behavioural impact on energy consumption: 'Human-in-the-loop' comfort process control. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 10(1-2), pp. 108-130. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

Optimizing comfort for occupants and its related energy use is becoming more important. Presently, however, heating ventilation air-conditioning (HVAC) system installations often do not work in practice effectively and efficiently as the behaviour of the occupants is not included. The results are comfort complaints as well as unnecessary high-energy consumption. As the end-user influence becomes even more important within the energy process of sustainable buildings, it is necessary to integrate the occupants in the buildings' performance control loop. Laboratory experiments were performed to look for a correlation between infrared (IR) sensor temperature registrations and individual perceived thermal comfort in an individually conditioned workplace. It proved that it is in principle possible to use the third finger skin temperature as a control parameter for perceived thermal comfort. In another experiment in a real in-use office building, a wireless sensor network was applied to describe user behaviour on room and floor level. The results showed that it is possible to capture individual user behaviour and to use this to further optimize comfort in relation to energy consumption. Based on our experiments, we could determine the influence of occupants' behaviour on energy use and determine possible energy reduction by implementing the human-in-the-loop process control strategy.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: energy consumption; perceived comfort; process control strategy; user influence
Index terms: wireless sensor network, complaint, energy reduction, sustainable building, becoming, process control, laboratory, comfort, thermal comfort, experiment, skin temperature, ventilation, strategy, office building, energy use, energy consumption
Subjects: sustainable construction, computer vision, energy systems, environmental engineering, building performance, research management, control systems, philosophical process, air quality, data collection methods, conflict resolution, management, construction type, occupational health and safety management
Topics: Sustainability, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Construction Technology, Digital Applications, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here