Jingmond, M and Ågren, R (2015) Unravelling causes of defects in construction. Construction Innovation, 15(2), pp. 198-218. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this study is to identify the primary root causes of defects in terms of why they persist in construction, despite the increasing implementation of quality systems. Defects in construction continue to be a source of concern in the construction industry. There have been studies that have tried to identify causes of defects. Although concepts are usually related to organisational factors, previous studies have been carried out on an operational level. There is a well-trodden area within the literature relating to the operational level, but little is known about the causes of defects on a higher, organisational level within construction. Design/methodology/approach - A new approach based on the notion of process causality and the use of cognitive mapping has been adopted. The aim was to take a step back and unravel causes of defects in the execution of construction projects. From workshops with representatives drawn from different parts of the industry, themes have been identified and investigated from a causation perspective. Findings - It was found that the causes of defects mainly reside in endogenous factors within organisations as opposed to execution failure or exogenous factors related to market, material or equipment behaviour. Originality/value - More specifically, it was found that the dominant cause of defects lies within organisational shortcomings, suggesting that improvements can be found on the management and strategic levels within projects instead of on the operational level.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction management,organisational effectiveness,defects,project management,production process,cognitive mapping |
| Index terms: | cognitive mapping, project management, implementation, construction industry, workshop, organizational factor, organizational effectiveness, construction project, methodology, production process |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, construction type, business, cognitive psychology, industry analysis, manufacturing engineering, research methods, production management, project management theory and practice |
| Topics: | Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Construction Technology, Procurement, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here