Manley, K and Chen, L (2015) Collaborative learning model of infrastructure construction: A capability perspective. Construction Innovation, 15(3), pp. 355-377. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to propose a new model to show how continuous joint learning of participant organisations improves project performance. Performance heterogeneity between collaborative infrastructure projects is typically examined by considering procurement systems and their governance mechanisms at static points in time. The literature neglects to consider the impact of dynamic learning capability, which is thought to reconfigure governance mechanisms over time in response to evolving market conditions. Design/methodology/approach - There are two stages of conceptual development. In the first stage, the management literature is analysed to explain the standard model of dynamic learning capability that emphasises three learning phases for organisations. This standard model is extended to derive a novel circular model of dynamic learning capability that shows a new feedback loop between performance and learning. In the second stage, the construction management literature is consulted, adding project lifecycle, stakeholder diversity and three organisational levels to the analysis to arrive at the collaborative model of dynamic learning capability. Findings - The collaborative model should enable construction organisations to successfully adapt and perform under changing market conditions. The complexity of learning cycles result in capabilities that are imperfectly imitable between organisations, explaining performance heterogeneity on projects. Originality/value - The collaborative model provides a theoretically substantiated description of project performance, driven by the evolution of procurement systems and governance mechanisms. The model’s empirical value will be tested in future research.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | dynamic capabilities,absorptive capacity,organisational learning,collaborative projects,construction innovation,infrastructure projects |
| Index terms: | project lifecycle, construction organization, governance, infrastructure project, collaborative learning, collaborative project, procurement system, project performance, market condition, organizational learning, absorptive capacity, infrastructure construction, complexity, construction innovation, evolution, dynamic capability, methodology, feedback loop |
| Subjects: | economic and policy analysis, learning methods, control systems, organization, project completion, business, environmental science, contractual arrangements, project management theory and practice, professional development, management, theoretical framing, civil engineering, research methods, infrastructure and transport systems, systems engineering, building construction |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Governance, Procurement, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy, Education |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here