A typological analysis of public apartment buildings in Ghana

Agyefi-Mensah, S; Post, J; van Egmond, E E L C; Badu, E and Mohammadi, M (2015) A typological analysis of public apartment buildings in Ghana. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 11(5), pp. 376-389. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

Typological studies are considered useful because they help trace and understand the changes in building characteristics from the past to the present. This knowledge serves as a basis for improvement and change in future designs. In Ghana, although different designs have been applied to public apartments since independence, it is not known what their typologies are in generic forms. This makes it difficult to raise research questions for post-occupancy evaluation and to formulate and test research hypothesis with respect to the relation between design attributes and use requirements. This study analyzes and presents a typological view of the public apartment buildings in Ghana synchronically using designs over the past five decades. A reductionist approach to data analysis, qualitative in nature, is used to describe the plan form characteristics of the designs, using the form of access – vertical and horizontal – as the criteria. The study found 11 mutually exclusive design typologies, the most dominant of which is the single central staircase with lobby access. The study builds on existing knowledge and contributes to knowledge and understanding with respect to the typo-morphological characteristics of public apartment buildings in Ghana.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: design solution; Ghana; plan form; public apartments; typology
Index terms: Ghana, post-occupancy evaluation, apartment building, data analysis, lobby
Subjects: evaluation methods, data analysis and analytics, construction type, architectural elements, Geography
Topics: Construction Technology, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Design Practice, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here