Karimi, H; Taylor, T R B; Goodrum, P M and Srinivasan, C (2016) Quantitative analysis of the impact of craft worker availability on construction project safety performance. Construction Innovation, 16(3), pp. 307-322. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose This paper aims to quantify the impact of craft worker shortage on construction project safety performance. Design/methodology/approach A database of 50 North American construction projects completed between 2001 and 2014 was compiled by taking information from a research project survey and the Construction Industry Institute Benchmarking and Metrics Database. The t-test and Mann-Whitney test were used to determine whether there was a significant difference in construction project safety performance on projects with craft worker recruiting difficulty. Poisson regression analysis was then used to examine the relationship between craft worker recruiting difficulty and Occupational Safety and Health Administration Total Number of Recordable Incident Cases per 200,000 Actual Direct Work Hours (TRIR) on construction projects. Findings The result showed that the TRIR distribution of a group of projects that reported craft worker recruiting difficulty tended to be higher than the TRIR distribution of a group of projects with no craft worker recruiting difficulty (p-value = 0.004). Moreover, the average TRIR of the projects that reported craft worker recruiting difficulty was more than two times the average TRIR of projects that experienced no craft recruiting difficulty (p-value = 0.035). Furthermore, the Poisson regression analysis demonstrated that there was a positive exponential relationship between craft worker recruiting difficulty and TRIR in construction projects (p-value = 0.004). Research limitations/implications The projects used to construct the database are heavily weighted towards industrial construction. Practical implications There have been significant long-term gains in construction safety within the USA. However, if recent craft shortages continue, the quantitative analyses presented herein indicate a strong possibility that more safety incidents will occur unless the shortages are reversed. Innovative construction means and methods should be developed and adopted to work in a safe manner with a less qualified workforce. Originality/value The Poisson regression model is the first model that quantifiably links project craft worker availability to construction project safety performance.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | safety,risk assessment,construction incidents,craft worker shortage,poisson regression analysis,statistical model |
| Index terms: | quantitative analysis, construction safety, benchmarking, shortages, safety performance, construction project, methodology, survey, statistical model, industrial construction, risk assessment, occupational safety and health, Construction Industry Institute, database, regression model, construction incident, poisson regression analysis |
| Subjects: | production management, financial risk, performance measurement, health risk and incident analysis, research methods, statistical analysis, environmental health, data management, occupational health and safety management, building construction, research organizations, data collection methods, data analysis and analytics, data science, economic analysis |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Quality Management, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here