Physiological cost of concrete construction activities

Lee, W and Migliaccio, G C (2016) Physiological cost of concrete construction activities. Construction Innovation, 16(3), pp. 281-306. ISSN 1471-4175

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper was to investigate the physiological cost of concrete construction activities. Design/methodology/approach Five concrete construction workers were recruited. The workers' three-week heart rate (HR) data were collected in summer and autumn. In this paper, several HR indexes were used to investigate the physiological cost of work in concrete construction trades, including average working HR, relative HR and ratio of working HR to resting HR. Findings This paper measures how absolute and relative HRs vary throughout a workday and how working HR compares to resting HR for individual workers. Research limitations/implications Field observations are usually extremely difficult as researchers need to overcome a number of barriers, including employers' resistance to perceived additional liabilities, employees' fear that their level of activity will be reported to managers and many other practical and technical difficulties. As these challenges increase exponentially with the number of employers, subjects and sites, this study was limited to a small number of subjects all working for the same employer on the same jobsite. Still, challenges are often unpredictable and lessons learned from this study are expected to guide both our and other researchers' continuation of this work. Originality/value The time effect on the physiological cost of work has not been considered in previous studies. Thus, this study is noteworthy owing to the depth of the data collected rather than the breadth of the data.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: biosensing and environmental sensing,occupational safety and health,physiological cost,threshold limit value,work physiology
Index terms: heart, summer, occupational safety and health, work physiology, biosensing, threshold limit value, lessons learned, concrete construction, methodology, environmental sensing, liability, manager
Subjects: environmental science, practitioner, climate science, building construction, occupational health and safety management, liability law, occupational health, research methods, medical science and clinical practice, professional development, health safety and environment
Topics: Legal Issues, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here