Sweis, G J; Hiyassat, M and Al-Hroub, F F (2016) Assessing lean conformance by first-grade contractors in the Jordanian construction industry. Construction Innovation, 16(4), pp. 446-459. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose There is little information existing about the spread of lean among Jordanian construction companies. Building on a report by Diekmann et al. (2004), this paper aims to perform a similar investigation among first-grade Jordanian construction companies to assess the extent of implementation of lean techniques. Design/methodology/approach For this purpose, a quantitative approach to measuring contractors' conformance to lean practices was adopted. A survey of 61 contractors was conducted using both e-mails and personally delivered surveys that were completed on the spot. The results were analysed, and a practice value index, which indicates the level of implementation, was figured out for lean practices. In addition, an analysis of variance was conducted to determine whether there were differences among respondents from different construction fields. Findings The survey indicated that some procedures used by Jordanian contractors were consistent with lean construction practices. However, there was no proof that lean concepts were used on a company-wide basis. Furthermore, the survey revealed that the Jordanian construction industry lacks a “continuous improvement“ mentality, suffers from the absence of error proofing devices and provides minimal training at several levels of the organisation. Originality/value The outcomes of the study are valuable for contractors and developers of management practices, as it will encourage them to adopt lean construction holistically and identify features that are not exploited in the Jordanian construction industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction management,project management,lean construction,construction engineering management,value management/engineering,construction production |
| Index terms: | construction company, construction engineering management, continuous improvement, lean construction, implementation, investigation, value index, construction industry, project management, construction production, e-mail, variance, methodology, value management, management practice, survey |
| Subjects: | measurement and scaling, economic analysis, industry analysis, building construction, research methods, performance measurement, operations management, organization, communication, data collection methods, project management theory and practice, contractual arrangements, management |
| Topics: | Site Management, Procurement, Quality Management, Project Management, Value Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here