Reflecting on 10 years of focus on innovation, organisational learning and knowledge management literature in a construction project management context

Walker, D H T (2016) Reflecting on 10 years of focus on innovation, organisational learning and knowledge management literature in a construction project management context. Construction Innovation, 16(2), pp. 114-126. ISSN 1471-4175

Abstract

Purpose This paper provides a brief critical analysis of how the focus on innovation diffusion, organisational learning and knowledge management has developed with an emphasis on the 2005-2015 period. The purpose of this paper is to provide a recent historic perspective on these concepts and suggest an integrated future focus for this research. Design/methodology/approach The paper identifies trends in how knowledge and learning is associated with innovation and experience based on a literature review. Findings The study of organisational learning and the management of knowledge and innovation diffusion is well-established in the construction and project management domains with two strongly emerging intertwined foci. On one hand, there has been a significant growing focus on learning through collaboration and the value of being a reflective practitioner. On the other hand, the exponential growth in the power of computing has led to “Big Data” reappearing to redefine data and information into pseudo-knowledge that is “blurring” the boundary of data, information and knowledge. Increasingly, we are likely to see effective innovation through more practical blending of these foci. Originality/value This provides a reflection on changing perspectives, on human and machine learning and knowledge management that may have a profound impact on future research themes.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: innovation,organisational learning,knowledge management,complex adaptive systems,project management,construction industry
Index terms: construction project management, reflection, project management, construction industry, computing, practitioner, collaboration, methodology, knowledge management, machine learning, organizational learning, innovation diffusion, big data, literature review, complex adaptive system
Subjects: industry analysis, information systems, sociology, professional development, project management theory and practice, management, research methods, artificial intelligence, data analysis and analytics, practitioner, computing systems, business
Topics: Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Project Management, Information Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here