Users’ influence on inter-organizational innovation: mapping the receptive context

Hedborg Bengtsson, S; Karrbom Gustavsson, T and Eriksson, P E (2018) Users’ influence on inter-organizational innovation: mapping the receptive context. Construction Innovation, 18(4), pp. 488-504. ISSN 1471-4175

Abstract

Purpose: Innovation is constantly present in the construction industry, however, mainly on a single project level. Initiating and implementing inter-organizational innovation in a multi-project context such as in urban development entails large complexity, for example, because of the many interdependent projects and users of innovation. The users’ influence on inter-organizational innovation in a multi-project context has not been fully explored. Accordingly, the purpose of this paper is to discuss how users influence inter-organizational innovation in multi-project contexts by mapping the receptiveness for change. Design/methodology/approach: A single case study approach was used, where empirical material including semi-structured interviews in combination with meeting observations, document studies and participative workshops were gathered. The rich empirical material, studying inter-organizational innovation in an urban development context, was mapped based on the receptive context for change framework. Findings: A receptive context for change was not present in the studied multi-project context. Communication to develop and implement inter-organizational innovation was not sufficient and the clients’ procurement strategies were to a large extent not developed to facilitate inter-organizational innovation. Findings show differences in users’ possibility and aim to implement inter-organizational innovation. Originality/value: The mapping of the receptive context to influence inter-organizational innovation widens the knowledge base and provides valuable insights on how inter-organizational innovation may be implemented in the loosely coupled construction industry. Furthermore, the findings broaden the discussion on clients as innovation supporters, and contribute to the debate on clients as innovation supporters, by highlighting the importance of distinguishing between different types of clients.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: innovation supporter; inter-organizational innovation; multi-project context; procurement strategies; receptive context; users
Index terms: urban development, construction industry, workshop, case study, procurement strategy, methodology, mapping, organizational innovation, complexity, interview, knowledge base
Subjects: industry analysis, information systems, systems engineering, urban design, research methods, spatial and geospatial analysis, contractual arrangements, data collection methods, construction type, business
Topics: Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Procurement, Construction Technology
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here