Haller, M; Lu, W; Stehn, L and Jansson, G (2015) An indicator for superfluous iteration in offsite building design processes. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 11(5), pp. 360-375. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
Enhancement of iteration management in the design phase is important for successful offsite building projects. Design iteration has two aspects. Although iteration is necessary to deal with design requirements when solving complex problems (i.e. increasing quality through iteration), it has also been identified in numerous studies to be one of the main causes of design errors and time and cost overruns (i.e. superfluous iteration), as it increases scheduling and design complexity. Current building project management tools do not provide a means to control the reduction of superfluous iteration. One problem is that existing research has difficulty precisely relating the effects of specific management actions to superfluous iteration. The idea of this study is to develop an indicator, the sequence deviation quotient (SDQ), which reflects the amount of superfluous design iteration in a project. It can be thought of as a tool supporting project managers to make systematic and continuous (from project to project) design process improvement. A premise is that the impact of varying project conditions on the process structure of design processes, i.e. the precedence relationships between the design activities, is only small. In this paper, we provide a definition of superfluous iteration. We tested the feasibility of the SDQ by subjecting it to project variation and input perturbation by means of a Monte Carlo simulation. The simulations are based on the data from a real offsite design building process, the designing of a 1100 m2 residential building in Sweden.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | design changes; design process simulation; design structure matrix; iteration; project performance indicator |
| Index terms: | project performance, design phase, variation, project management, precedence relationship, complexity, building process, design error, project manager, scheduling, design process, residential building, building design, design structure matrix, Sweden, deviation, cost overrun, design change, Monte Carlo simulation |
| Subjects: | systems engineering, building construction, project management theory and practice, contractual condition, Geography, architectural design, financial and cost management, contractual arrangements, professional practice, operations research, modelling and simulation, design methods, profession, construction type |
| Topics: | Site Management, Contract Administration, Time Control, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Procurement, Cost Management, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here