Critical factors for transferring and sharing tacit knowledge within lean and agile construction processes

Saini, M; Arif, M and Kulonda, D J (2018) Critical factors for transferring and sharing tacit knowledge within lean and agile construction processes. Construction Innovation, 18(1), pp. 64-89. ISSN 1471-4175

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of the paper is to investigate the critical success factors (CSFs) associated with the effectiveness of transfer and sharing of tacit knowledge in lean and agile construction processes. Design/methodology/approach The study identifies ten CSFs that initiate the transferring and sharing of tacit knowledge. The CSFs are validated through quantitative study. This study recruited project managers, executives, consultants and other managers that are directly involved in the management of a construction project. It recruits the respondents those have background and experience from disciplines such as lean construction, agile construction, construction supply chain (CSC) and knowledge management in lean, agile and CSC. The data collected through self-administrative questionnaire are categorised as ordinal data to analyse in SPSS with frequency and Kruskal-Wallis H test, Spearman’s correlation analysis and a rank-order analysis is done to establish the level of importance of those factors. Findings Initially, “Trust between construction organisations” is identified as the foremost CSF. Moreover, other CSFs such as motivation, leadership capabilities, business strategies and organisational capabilities follow trust. Originality/value This is the first study that investigates and establishes the CSFs that are essential to initiate transferring and sharing tacit knowledge in a lean and in an agile construction processes.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: knowledge management,organisational learning,lean construction,construction supply chain,lean and agile construction process,transferring and sharing tacit knowledge
Index terms: executive, effectiveness, construction supply chain, lean and agile construction process, project manager, construction organization, critical factor, correlation analysis, questionnaire, construction process, methodology, construction project, knowledge management, critical success factor, tacit knowledge, manager, lean construction, organizational learning, motivation, business strategy
Subjects: professional development, production management, performance management, research methods, statistical analysis, building construction, practitioner, control systems, construction logistics, organization, business, profession, risk assessment, data collection methods, psychology
Topics: Business Strategy, Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Supply Chain Management, Human Resources, Quality Management, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here