Ibrahim, M N; Thorpe, D and Mahmood, M N (2019) Risk factors affecting the ability for earned value management to accurately assess the performance of infrastructure projects in Australia. Construction Innovation, 19(4), pp. 550-569. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate a set of risk-related factors influencing the earned value management (EVM) concept as an assessment technique in evaluating the progress of modern sustainable infrastructure construction projects. Design/methodology/approach: A qualitative research approach has been adopted for identifying risk-related factors influencing EVM concept from a literature review and through interviewing industry personnel, followed by an inductive process to form sets of key factors and their measuring items. Findings: EVM is a common method for assessing project performance. A weakness of this approach is that EVM assessment in its current form does not measure the impact of a number of project performance factors that result from the complexity of modern infrastructure construction projects, and thus does not accurately assess their impact in this performance. This paper discusses and explains a range of potential risk factors to evaluating project performance such as sustainability, stakeholder requirements, communication, procurement strategy, weather, experience of staff, site condition, design issues, financial risk, subcontractor, government requirements and material. In addition, their measuring items were identified. Practical implications: This research assists projects managers to improve the evaluation process of infrastructure construction performance by incorporating a range of factors likely to impact on that performance and which are not included in current EVM calculations. Originality/value: This research addresses the need to include in the EVM calculation a range of risk factors affecting the performance of infrastructure projects in Australia and therefore makes this calculation a more reliable tool for assessing project performance.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | earned value management; infrastructure construction; performance; project management; risk management |
| Index terms: | infrastructure construction, subcontractor, weather, complexity, methodology, qualitative research, literature review, earned value management, personnel, manager, infrastructure project, project management, project performance, risk management, risk factor, procurement strategy, Australia |
| Subjects: | environmental hazards, systems engineering, infrastructure and transport systems, project management theory and practice, Geography, research methods, civil engineering, management, contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics, control systems, practitioner, air quality, research design and methodology, risk assessment |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Sustainability, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here