Sundling, R (2019) A development process for extending buildings vertically – based on a case study of four extended buildings. Construction Innovation, 19(3), pp. 367-385. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of the study, upon which this paper is based, was to contribute an improved understanding of the vertical extension of buildings, by presenting a development process for its implementation in which the key aspects to consider when planning such extensions are highlighted. Design/methodology/approach: The approach is based on linking the diffusion of innovation together with case study research to stimulate further development in vertically extending buildings. Four cases of vertically extended buildings in Sweden were selected for the study. Findings: The development process highlights seven key areas for decisions when planning a vertical extension. These areas are: opportunities for vertical extension; strategies for implementation; detailed planning process; concept development; evaluation; building permit; and procurement. The development processes and lessons learnt from each case are presented, covering both success and failure. Research limitations/implications: The research is based on four cases of vertically extended buildings. The findings offer valuable insights into the development process which should provide the research community with an improved understanding of the challenges faced. Practical implications: The findings will help planners, housing owners, housing developers and facility managers better understand the conditions that favour successful implementation of vertical extensions. Originality/value: The paper provides the reader with an understanding of the challenges faced in the vertical extension of a building and the means of overcoming them to create a simplified development process.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | case study; sustainable development |
| Index terms: | strategy, sustainable development, manager, housing, housing developer, methodology, Sweden, owner, case study, planning process, diffusion of innovation, implementation, planner |
| Subjects: | sociology, project controls, research methods, management, professional development, Geography, health safety and environment, contractual arrangements, profession, construction type, data collection methods, practitioner |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here