Ayinla, K O; Cheung, F and Tawil, A R (2020) Demystifying the concept of offsite manufacturing method: Towards a robust definition and classification system. Construction Innovation, 20(2), pp. 223-246. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to develop a more inclusive working definition and a formalised classification system for offsite construction to enable common basis of evaluation and communication. Offsite manufacturing (OSM) is continuously getting recognised as a way to increase efficiency and boost productivity of the construction industry in many countries. However, the knowledge of OSM varies across different countries, construction practices and individual experts thus resulting into major misconceptions. The lack of consensus of what OSM is and what constitutes its methods creates a lot of misunderstanding across Architecture Engineering and Construction (AEC) industry professionals, therefore, inhibiting a global view and understanding for multicultural collaboration. Therefore, there is a need to revisit these issues with the aim to develop a deep understanding of the concepts and ascertain what is deemed inclusive or exclusive. Design/methodology/approach: A state-of-the-art review and analysis of literature on OSM was conducted to observe trends in OSM definitions and classifications. The paper identifies gaps in existing methods and proposes a future direction. Findings: Findings suggest that classifications are mostly aimed towards a particular purpose and existing classification system are not robust enough to cover all aspects. Therefore, there is need to extend these classification systems to be fit for various purposes. Originality/value: This paper contributes to the body of literature on offsite concepts, definition and classification, and provides knowledge on the broader context on the fundamentals of OSM.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building; classification; construction management; construction production; construction technology; definition; literature review; offsite manufacturing; open manufacturing/offsite construction; prefabrication; property management |
| Index terms: | methodology, collaboration, state of the art, open manufacturing, literature review, prefabrication, construction industry, property management, construction production, construction technology, efficiency, productivity |
| Subjects: | data analysis and analytics, operations management, real estate economics, research dissemination and communication, digital engineering, industry analysis, building construction, management, manufacturing engineering, research methods, performance management |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Site Management, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here