Martin-Du Pan, O; Eames, P; Rowley, P; Bouchlaghem, D and Susman, G (2015) Current and future operation scenarios for a 50,000 MWh district heating system. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 11(4), pp. 280-304. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
The performance of Pimlico District Heating Undertaking (PDHU), in London, with an annual heating load of 50,000 MWh was analysed throughout 2012. Half-hourly data for the system were investigated to determine the natural gas consumed, operation of the 2500 m3 accumulator, the two 1.6 MWe combined heat and power (CHP) engines, the three 8 MW boilers, the electricity import and export and the consumers' heat consumption. These data were used to characterise the current performance in detail, and an energy flow diagram for the system energy flows was generated. The modulating efficiencies of the boilers varied from 84% to 91%, whereas the CHP engines performed with a modulating near constant electrical efficiency of 40%, but with a thermal efficiency that decreases with higher load. The current operation of the plant is compared across 10 scenarios. These scenarios were compared while (i) using the accumulator more effectively to let the boilers operate at full load only and (ii) using the provided maintenance agreement contract of the CHP engines to guarantee their good operation. Optimising the operation of the current plant reduces the annual heating cost of £165,000 or 12% and investing in additional CHP capacity can reduce the CO2 emissions by 28%.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cogeneration; combined heat and power; district heating; post occupancy evaluation |
| Index terms: | consumption, export, London, heating load, district heating, post-occupancy evaluation, import, CO2 emissions, guarantee, efficiency |
| Subjects: | energy systems, economic analysis, evaluation methods, air quality, consumer economics, contract structure, performance management, Geography |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Procurement, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here