OSD: A framework for the early stage parametric optimisation of the structural design in BIM-based platform

Hamidavi, T; Abrishami, S; Ponterosso, P; Begg, D and Nanos, N (2020) OSD: A framework for the early stage parametric optimisation of the structural design in BIM-based platform. Construction Innovation, 20(2), pp. 149-169. ISSN 1471-4175

Abstract

Purpose: The paper aims to leverage the importance of the integrated automatic structural design for tall buildings at the early stage. It proposes to use an automatic prototype to perform the structural design, analysis and optimisation in a building information modelling (BIM)-based platform. This process starts with extracting the required information from the architectural model in Revit Autodesk, such as boundary conditions and designs different options of the structural models in Robot Autodesk. In this process, Dynamo for Revit is used to define the mathematical functions to use different variables and generate various structural models. The paper aims to expand the domain of automation in the BIM platform to reduce the iterative process in different areas such as conceptual structural design and collaboration between architects and structural engineers to reduce the time and cost at the early stages. Design/methodology/approach: The paper begins with an exploratory research by adopting a qualitative methodology and using open-ended questions to achieve more information about the phenomenon of automation and interoperability between structural engineers and architects and gain new insight into this area. Furthermore, correlation research is used by adopting quantitative and short questions to compare the proposed prototype with the traditional process of the structural design and optimisation and the interoperability between architects and engineers and consequently, validate the research. Findings: As an outcome of the research, a structural design optimisation (SDO) prototype was developed to semi-automate the structural design process of tall buildings at the early stages. Moreover, the proposed prototype can be used during the early stage of structural design in different areas such as residential buildings, bridges, truss, reinforced concrete detailing, etc. Moreover, comprehensive literature regarding using automation in structural design, optimisation process and interoperability between architects and engineers is conducted that provides a new insight to contribute to future research and development. Research limitations/implications: Due to the time limit, the paper results may lack in a comprehensive automatic structural design process. Therefore, the researchers are encouraged to expand the workability of the prototype for a comprehensive automatic design check such as automatic design for the minimum deflection, displacement of different types of buildings. Practical implications: The prototype includes implications for the development of different automatic designs. Originality/value: The focus of this paper is the optimisation of the structural design in the BIM platform by using automation. This combination is one of the novelties of this paper, and the existing literature has a very limited amount of information and similar work in this area, especially interoperability between architects and engineers.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: integration
Index terms: engineer, platform, boundary condition, building information modelling, residential building, option, interoperability, automation, architect, exploratory research, prototype, workability, tall building, structural design, reinforced concrete, integration, methodology, mathematical function, collaboration, structural engineer, research and development
Subjects: mathematical modelling, architectural engineering, construction type, profession, design methods, modelling and simulation, building materials, research methods, structural engineering, management, digital design, automation and robotics, decision analysis, research management, organizational analysis, systems and processes, information systems
Topics: Construction Technology, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Construction Materials, Organizational Design, Design Practice, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here