A constraint-based parametric model to support building services design exploration

Medjdoub, B and Chenini, M B (2015) A constraint-based parametric model to support building services design exploration. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 11(2), pp. 123-136. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

In this paper, we present a generative design approach using constraint-based programming to handle the space configuration for ceiling mounted fan coil systems in buildings. This work utilises and builds on the result from previous projects presented in Medjdoub et al. [(2003). Generation of variational standard plant room solutions. Automation in Construction, 12(2), 155–166] and Medjdoub [(2009). Constraint-based adaptation for complex space configuration in building services. ITcon, 14, 724–735.]. In Medjdoub [(2009). Constraint-based adaptation for complex space configuration in building services. ITcon, 14, 724–735], we have presented a hybrid approach using case-based reasoning and constraint satisfaction problem approach to deal with the space configuration and pipe routing of complex design problems for ceiling mounted fan coil systems in buildings. One of the limitations of the aforementioned approach is that the solution generated is defined only geometrically. In this work, we have redefined the case library by describing each case as a graph of design constraints. This new definition of the cases supports the generation of parametric solutions, where further interactive modification can be done by the user while maintaining all the design constraints. This brings benefits in terms of increasing the quality of the solution by providing the user the possibility to make the appropriate modifications using his/her heuristic knowledge. Finally, this approach has been benchmarked using real scenario design projects.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building services; constraints; interactivity; optimisation; parametric model
Index terms: building service, satisfaction, case-based reasoning, heuristic, adaptation, exploration, programming, configuration, automation, generative design
Subjects: automation and robotics, design process, systems engineering, cognitive psychology, engineering systems, programming, risk assessment, user focus, project delivery, environmental resource management
Topics: Design Practice, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here