Abd Elsalam, M F (2021) Breaking through the classical determinants in the field of hyper urban planning. Construction Innovation, 21(4), pp. 818-836. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
This paper could be considered as the first step of grounding the ambitions and speculations about hyper urban planning. In other words, it is just a brief approach for the critical discussion of hyper urban planning field, without too many details or long explanations, so further studying, arguing and additional future research should be done. The scientific methodology is based on descriptive and analytical methods, in addition to case study method of data collection. Therefore, the paper has reviewed 16 case studies, which could arguably be lumped under the title of "hyper urban planning". The study focuses on proposing a new way to view urban planning, that is the hyper urban planning, which could be considered as a sort of specialized urban branch of advanced level, characterized by special criteria, which stimulates innovative and creative proposals for the future smart cities. Hyper urban planning field generally aims to contribute to liberating and releasing the full creative imagination of the urban planners' minds, outside the box and away from the exaggerated strict constraints. Practical implications: The study has been based on theoretical aspects in addition to empirical experiments. The practical aspects reflect the potential and promising features of hyper urban planning, especially with regard to using creativity, sustainability and innovative technology solutions. Social implications: The paper's analyses show that many hyper urban proposals have a high potential sustainability, environmentally, socially and economically. As urban problems and built environment challenges have become more complex, the proposed vertical eco-cities under the umbrella of hyper urban planning field may arguably be promising and more sustainable urban solutions for the previously mentioned challenges.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction innovation; hyper urban planning; smart cities; urban determinants; urban development; urban planning |
| Index terms: | urban development, planner, determinant, built environment challenge, case study, creativity, smart city, methodology, construction innovation, urban planning, proposal, experiment |
| Subjects: | innovation and creative processes, building construction, urban design, research methods, project planning, sustainability and resilience, urban planning, urban sustainability, data collection methods, risk assessment, profession |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Urban Studies, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Governance, Risk Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here