Dharmapalan, V; O'Brien, W J; Morrice, D and Jung, M (2021) Assessment of visibility in industrial construction projects: A viewpoint from supply chain stakeholders. Construction Innovation, 21(4), pp. 782-799. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Stakeholders of construction projects exhibit different perceptions regarding the visibility of materials in the supply chain, which affects the timely delivery and installation of materials. This study aims to quantitatively investigate the differences in viewpoints of owners, contractors, designers and suppliers about the visibility of materials at supply chain locations and different material types during the construction of industrial projects. Survey data about visibility at nine typical supply chain locations and three common material types were collected from owner, contractor, designer and supplier groups and analyzed using frequency statistics, relative importance index and tests for equality of odds. Offsite Tier-2 supplier, ports and kitting site shows the lowest visibility level for the owner, contractor, supplier and designer groups. Also, the supplier group tends to have adequate to extreme visibility at the Tier-2 supplier, kitting site and during transportation compared to owner, contractor and designer groups. An example finding concerning the visibility of material types is that owners and contractors perceive prefabricated material requires higher visibility than all other material types. The findings are limited to construction projects in the industrial sector. Further, the survey participants were based in North America at the time of participation. Practical implications: The study's findings indicate how visibility is spread across supply chain locations and for material types for the owners, contractors, suppliers and designers of industrial projects. As such, academia and industry's research and investment efforts can be more focused on locations and material types that need improvement. Social implications: Industrial projects play an essential part in improving society's daily lives, and this study's findings contribute to improving the efficiency of the supply chain during construction of industrial projects. Although previous studies mentioned the need and importance of visibility improvement, none have sought to understand the perception of leading supply chain stakeholders about visibility at supply chain locations and of material types. This study's findings provide specific insights and directions for advancing in these areas with regard to supply chain visibility.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | information sharing; materials management; supply chain management; supply chain visibility |
| Index terms: | construction project, materials management, society, relative importance index, supply chain visibility, survey, information sharing, academia, statistics, industrial construction, efficiency, owner, designer |
| Subjects: | mathematical modelling, data collection methods, profession, risk assessment, supplier oversight, operations management, production management, data exchange, performance management, communities and social development, building construction, educational institutions, sociology |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Site Management, Education, Digital Applications, Supply Chain Management, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here