El Sawalhi, N I and Yazgi, A N (2021) House of quality: A method to identify landscape design requirements. Construction Innovation, 21(3), pp. 441-455. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
The level of live, reduction of pollution and positive human health is affected by the quality of landscape. In addition, many benefits such as aesthetic, psychological and social can be achieved. The quality of landscape is integrated with the individual's needs. The scope of landscape must be determined according to user needs and planning methods. The purpose of this study is to propose a house of quality (HOQ) model to identify the landscape design requirements. The Islamic University of Gaza (IUG) was used as a case study. The need to implement the proposed HOQ model has been identified. Also, the male and female students' priorities have been identified, and the weight of campus landscape design elements was extracted. The male and female IUG students' needs were identified using a questionnaire survey. The data were analyzed for testing statistical validity and reliability using SPSS. HOQ model was built using EDRAW Max program. The ten most important student needs are "cleanliness, praying, feeling safe, feeling comfortable psychic, drinking, spaciousness and breadth, shading, quiet, rest and sitting, and fresh air". Based on these results and needs assessment, the HOQ was constructed. The most important design elements are "group of seats, shrubs, trees, lawns, pergola, and seats chairs or benches". This study adds to the designer's knowledge about HOQ application in design, and contributes significantly to consider public participation as a way in collecting the voice of customers.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | house of quality; landscape; landscape design; quality landscape; user needs |
| Index terms: | house of quality, shading, public participation, questionnaire, voice of customer, user need, program, survey, human health, testing, landscape design, designer, validity, aesthetic, planning method, case study, pollution, quality landscape |
| Subjects: | design practice, building design, factor and component analysis, software systems, public and environmental health, quality assurance, environmental health, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, profession, user-centered design, urban planning, quality function deployment, participation process, professional practice |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Digital Applications, Quality Management, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Governance |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here