Garg, R; Chhikara, R; Singh, R; Agrawal, G; Talwar, V and Mehra, V (2021) A qualitative study to understand the factors affecting the adoption of glass fiber-reinforced gypsum (gfrg) as a sustainable building technology: Insights from Indian construction industry. Construction Innovation, 21(2), pp. 321-344. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
This paper aims to assess the factors favoring the adoption of the challenges faced and support mechanism, which will lead to the proliferation of glass fiber-reinforced gypsum (GFRG) technology in India. Semi-structured interviews with 35 experts, including construction developers, architects, contractors, government officials and design consultants, were conducted. This qualitative data was analyzed using thematic analysis and matrix analysis. GFRG-based buildings produce much less carbon footprints as compared to traditional ones and can be safely recommended as a promising, environmentally sensitive technology of the future. The major drivers in its adoption are its efficient construction capability, energy and soil conservation and significant waste reduction. Some of the challenges in implementation are long planning time, lack of skilled labor, lack of awareness about green building technologies and myopic perception of high cost incurred in green building adoption in people's minds. Practical implications: This study establishes that the construction industry has the potential to contribute toward creating a sustainable and green planet. It does so by evaluating and then positively positioning GFRG as an environmentally friendly building system. The harmful effects of continuous environmental manipulation by humans leading to its degradation is a critical discussion agenda for most nations of the world. The issue has been taken up seriously by developing countries, and now, developing countries are also becoming sensitised to it. Several policies toward the attainment of this goal have been formulated and are being implemented by government and private bodies. Although some authors have studied the issues and challenges related to the adoption of green buildings, their attempts mostly focused on developed countries. Moreover, research that investigated the evaluation of the GFRG building system as a successful green technology of the future is inadequate.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction technology; glass fiber-reinforced gypsum; sustainability; green buildings |
| Index terms: | sustainable building, green building, soil conservation, thematic analysis, developed country, waste reduction, developing country, interview, skilled labour, gypsum, building system, architect, India, implementation, construction industry, construction technology, environmentally friendly, carbon footprint, matrix analysis, becoming, support mechanism, qualitative study, degradation |
| Subjects: | building materials, material degradation and durability, data science, contractual arrangements, digital engineering, organization, research design and methodology, data collection methods, profession, engineering systems, environmental impact, philosophical process, industry analysis, sustainability assessment, management, design practice, development economics, sustainable construction, land management, methods and analysis, Geography, sustainable design |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Digital Applications, Human Resources, International Construction, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Construction Materials |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here