Ghansah, F A; Owusu-Manu, D G; Ayarkwa, J; Edwards, D J and Hosseini, M R (2021) Exploration of latent barriers inhibiting project management processes in adopting smart building technologies (sbts) in the developing countries. Construction Innovation, 21(4), pp. 685-707. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
While smart building technologies (SBTs) implementation ensures sustainability, their adoption is hampered by latent barriers, especially in project management processes. These latent barriers must be addressed to facilitate the successful and widespread adoption of SBTs. Therefore, this study aims to explore the significant latent barriers inhibiting the project management processes in adopting SBTs in developing countries. A positivist research philosophy couched within a deductive approach was adopted to undertake a quantitative questionnaire survey of 227 project management and design team participants. Descriptive and inferential analytical tools (including a one sample T-test and exploratory factor analysis) were then adopted to interpret data collected. The results reveal that the "high cost of smart sustainable materials and equipment" is the major significant barrier hindering the adoption of SBTs in developing countries. Latent barriers were: "structure and time-related barriers", "construction-related barriers" and "human, policy and cost-related barriers". The study contributes novel insights into the prevailing nascent discourse on SBTs from the perspectives of construction project managers and design teams in developing countries, particularly. Furthermore, to the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first study that ascertains the significant barriers inhibiting project management processes in adopting SBTs in developing countries.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction technology; developing countries; Ghana; innovation; project management processes; smart building technologies |
| Index terms: | smart building technology, Ghana, implementation, project management, construction technology, project management process, design team, survey, philosophy, manager, exploratory factor analysis, developing country, sustainable material, exploration, construction project, questionnaire |
| Subjects: | production management, Geography, development economics, project management theory and practice, philosophical studies, statistical analysis, sustainable materials, practitioner, data collection methods, digital engineering, professional practice, contractual arrangements, environmental resource management, building innovation |
| Topics: | International Construction, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Sustainability, Procurement, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here