Guven, G and Ergen, E (2021) Tracking major resources for automated progress monitoring of construction activities: Masonry work case. Construction Innovation, 21(4), pp. 648-667. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to monitor the progress of construction activities in an automated way by using sensor-based technologies for tracking multiple resources that are used in building construction. An automated on-site progress monitoring approach was proposed and a proof-of-concept prototype was developed, followed by a field experimentation study at a high-rise building construction site. The developed approach was used to integrate sensor data collected from multiple resources used in different steps of an activity. It incorporated the domain-specific heuristics that were related to the site layout conditions and method of activity. The prototype estimated the overall progress with 95% accuracy. More accurate and up-to-date progress measurement was achieved compared to the manual approach, and the need for visual inspections and manual data collection from the field was eliminated. Overall, the field experiments demonstrated that low-cost implementation is possible, if readily available or embedded sensors on equipment are used. Previous studies either monitored one particular piece of equipment or the developed approaches were only applicable to limited activity types. This study demonstrated that it is technically feasible to determine progress at the site by fusing sensor data that are collected from multiple resources during the construction of building superstructure. The rule-based reasoning algorithms, which were developed based on a typical work practice of cranes and hoists, can be adapted to other activities that involve transferring bulk materials and use cranes and/or hoists for material handling.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | data fusion; field test; progress monitoring; radio frequency; resource tracking; sensor-based technologies |
| Index terms: | accuracy, sensor data, building construction, field test, visual inspection, work practice, construction site, progress monitoring, heuristic, progress measurement, site layout, sensor-based technology, hoist, reasoning, material handling, construction activity, prototype, experiment, radio frequency, resource tracking, high-rise building, data fusion, implementation |
| Subjects: | work location, risk assessment, modelling and simulation, project controls, construction type, product delivery, innovation and technology management, site logistics, construction equipment, data collection methods, cognitive psychology, management, construction operations, resource management, building construction, professional development, contractual arrangements, research products and data, data science, professional practice, communication |
| Topics: | Supply Chain Management, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Procurement, Digital Applications, Construction Technology, Site Management, Organizational Design, Plant and Equipment, Information Management, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here