Construction productivity assessment on brock commons tallwood house

Kasbar, M; Staub-French, S; Pilon, A; Poirier, E; Teshnizi, Z and Froese, T (2021) Construction productivity assessment on brock commons tallwood house. Construction Innovation, 21(4), pp. 951-968. ISSN 1471-4175

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to improve the understanding of the impact of mass timber construction methods on construction performance through the successful delivery of the first-of-a-kind tall wood building, Brock Commons Tallwood House (Tallwood House). This paper is one of a set of papers examining the project; companion papers describe innovations used during the mass timber design and construction processes. A mixed-method, longitudinal case study approach was used in this research project to investigate and document the Tallwood House project. Quantitative data were collected to perform the following analysis: hook time, the variability of productivity and schedule reliability. Members of the research team observed construction progress, meetings and decision-making, conducted periodic interviews and reviewed project artifacts. The research presented in this paper is the culmination of a longitudinal study aimed at studying the innovation process on a project where radical innovations of structural systems were developed. Prefabrication, combined with the use of a virtual design and construction (VDC) model for planning and fabrication and early collaboration with trades, construction managers and consultants, increased the labor productivity of the on-site erection of the mass timber structural components and envelope panels and expedited the construction schedule. This paper details an in-depth investigation into the construction productivity for a unique building project and lessons learned. The case study chosen is the construction of Tallwood House at the University of British Columbia. Tallwood House was the tallest mass-timber hybrid building in the world at the time of its construction.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction performance; crane time; hook time; innovation; mass timber; prefabrication; schedule reliability; tall wood; variability; virtual design and construction
Index terms: investigation, design and construction, labour productivity, virtual design and construction, fabrication, variability, prefabrication, construction productivity, hook time, case study, construction performance, productivity, crane time, construction manager, collaboration, decision-making, commons, mass timber, lessons learned, interview, tall wood, schedule reliability, construction method, artifact
Subjects: statistical analysis, project controls, building construction, sociology, decision analysis, professional development, digital design, manufacturing engineering, management, performance assessment, construction operations, property law, contractual arrangements, operations management, building materials, data collection methods, profession
Topics: Procurement, Construction Technology, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy, Time Control, Organizational Design, Site Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here