Information asymmetries between vendors and customers in the advanced construction technology diffusion process

M.E. Sepasgozar, S; Shirowzhan, S and Loosemore, M (2021) Information asymmetries between vendors and customers in the advanced construction technology diffusion process. Construction Innovation, 21(4), pp. 857-874. ISSN 1471-4175

Abstract

Advanced construction technologies (ACTs) are transforming infrastructure projects, yet there has been little research into and theorization of the process by which these innovations are diffused. The purpose of this paper is to address this paucity of research by exploring the problems of information asymmetries between vendors and customers in the ACT diffusion process. Specifically, the paper explores whether information asymmetries exist between vendors and customers in the ACT diffusion process and what forms they take. A structured survey of 153 vendors and customers of advanced construction technologies was undertaken across three international ACT exhibitions in Australia. By comparing the perspectives of both customers and vendors across 15 technology diffusion process variables using importance-performance analysis and principal component analysis, significant differences are found between vendors' and customers' perceptions of how effectively information flows in the ACT diffusion process. The results show that vendors are significantly more optimistic than customers about information asymmetries on a wide range of diffusion variables. They also highlight significant potential for information asymmetries to occur which can undermine the advanced technology diffusion process. The results provide important new conceptual and practical insights into an under-researched area, which is of increasing importance to a major industry, which is being transformed by advanced technological developments.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: advanced construction technologies; diffusion; industry 4.0; information asymmetry; infrastructure; innovation; performance; technology; vendor
Index terms: performance analysis, principal component analysis, infrastructure project, industry 4.0, advanced construction technology, Australia, information asymmetry, information flow, survey
Subjects: data analysis and analytics, technology adoption, data collection methods, transaction economics, infrastructure and transport systems, statistical analysis, information systems, Geography, manufacturing engineering
Topics: Digital Applications, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here