Moharrami, S; Taghaddos, M; RazaviAlavi, S R and AbouRizk, S (2021) A hybrid simulation approach for microtunneling construction planning. Construction Innovation, 21(3), pp. 363-378. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Construction planning for microtunneling projects is a complex process due to the high level of uncertainties inherent in underground construction and the interdependent nature of decision variables. Simulation is a suitable decision-making tool to account for uncertainties and to model complex dependencies among decision variables. This paper aims to improve microtunneling construction planning by using simulation. This study proposes a hybrid simulation approach that combines discrete event simulation (DES) with continuous simulation (CS) for microtunneling construction planning. In this approach, DES is used to model construction processes at the activity level and CS is used to model the continuous flow of soil material in the system. To demonstrate the capability of the proposed approach in construction planning of microtunneling projects, different construction plan scenarios are compared in a microtunneling case study. The results of the case study show suitability of the hybrid DES-CS approach in simulating microtunneling construction processes and the practicality of the approach for identifying the most efficient construction plan. This study proposes a new modeling approach for microtunneling construction processes using hybrid simulation and provides decision support at the construction planning stage of projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction planning; decision support; hybrid simulation; microtunneling; simulation; uncertainty modelling |
| Index terms: | decision support, construction process, microtunneling, decision-making, uncertainty modelling, suitability, discrete event simulation, case study, construction planning, hybrid simulation, modelling, underground construction |
| Subjects: | design criteria, environmental hazards, building construction, decision analysis, geotechnical engineering, analytical methods, construction planning, modelling and simulation, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Sustainability, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here