Obi, L I; Arif, M; Awuzie, B; Islam, R; Gupta, A D and Walton, R (2021) Critical success factors for cost management in public-housing projects. Construction Innovation, 21(4), pp. 625-647. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Effective cost performance is a crucial criterion measuring successful project management in public-housing projects. This paper aims to analyse the vital underlying factors surrounding the successful cost management process (CMP) outcomes in public housing projects (PHPs). The research was conducted in three stages. The first stage consisted of a detailed literature review to document success factors affecting cost performances and management. In stage two, brainstorming sessions were undertaken with construction experts knowledgeable in cost management practices and have been involved in PHPs. These sessions were used to refine those success factors for the PHPs settings and define their criticality with respect to the CMP stages using interpretive ranking process. In stage three, focus group sessions were performed to validate the interrelationships of the contextualised critical success factors. The top three most critical factors for successful implementation and outcomes at all CMP stages in PHPs settings were found to relate to competencies, team qualities and collaborative practices of the project team. Early contractor involvement and effective construction planning and management also emerged relevant to the process. Practical implications: Government project departments, project managers and construction organisations (consultants and contractors) need to commit and mandate continuous development of cost management competencies for all professionals engaged in PHPs. Channels supporting team integration and collaborative practices between design and construction teams are required to increase the likelihood of successful project cost management practice and outcomes in PHPs. The research has developed a factor-process relationship model that can be used to improve and evaluate the efficacy of CMP implementation in PHP settings.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cost management; critical success factors; interpretive ranking process; project team; public-housing project |
| Index terms: | mandate, early contractor involvement, success factor, housing project, critical success factor, critical factor, collaborative practice, public housing, literature review, management practice, construction planning, integration, project cost, government project, project management, design and construction, focus group, construction organization, cost management, project team, interpretive ranking process, project manager, cost performance, implementation |
| Subjects: | project delivery, management, housing and residential development, health monitoring assessment and metrics, control systems, collaborative management, contractual arrangements, accounting and finance, decision-making and optimization, organizational analysis, construction type, administrative law, political science, project management theory and practice, economics, data collection methods, organization, data analysis and analytics, profession, risk assessment, construction planning |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Project Management, Construction Technology, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Site Management, Urban Studies, Governance, Cost Management, Procurement, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here