Creating a case for innovation acceleration in the New Zealand building industry

Adafin, J; Wilkinson, S; Rotimi, J O B; MacGregor, C; Tookey, J and Potangaroa, R (2022) Creating a case for innovation acceleration in the New Zealand building industry. Construction Innovation, 22(1), pp. 185-204. ISSN 1471-4175

Abstract

This study aims to examine how innovation can be accelerated within the New Zealand (NZ) building industry to improve the productivity and efficiency of the industry. The study adopted a mixed philosophical approach combining interpretivism and post-positivism. Data for the study were obtained through a focus group of 50 practitioners that were selected using a stratified sampling procedure. All focus group data were audio-recorded, notes of the discussions were taken and then transcribed, de-identified and managed using NVivo software. Data analysis was undertaken using thematic analysis and inductive reasoning consistent with interpretative phenomenological analysis. The study findings revealed that the industry could benefit from the adoption of new and emerging technologies to improve its performance, especially its productivity and efficiency. Key drivers for the adoption of innovative practices included the adaptation of "local best practices" from case studies that would consist of stories of successful innovations that could foster confidence in future innovation. It was also identified that Government and industry should nurture innovation through collaborative contracts, policies and regulations. Further, it was highlighted that a culture of innovation needed to be developed to help nurture competencies and capability within the industry workforce. This study provides an in-depth examination of the need for innovation from the point of view of building industry practitioners. This study provides a useful starting-off point for further research and for the creation of policies that could help to support and accelerate innovation within the NZ building industry. Practical implications: NZ's building industry productivity and efficiency have been sub-optimal relative to other industries. But using evidence from the experiences and knowledge of industry practitioners, strategies can be developed to accelerate innovation within the NZ building industry that could help reverse industry performance. Further, the research findings can help inform government policies to develop support mechanisms that could encourage innovation in the industry in NZ. In addition, it is anticipated that the findings will provide a useful set of guidance for other countries that have similar market and physical constraints as those encountered by NZ. There is a dearth of empirical studies on innovation in the NZ building industry which the current study contributes to. By sharing industry practitioners' experiences and knowledge of innovation, the paper seeks to counteract more technocratic and technological optimist accounts of innovation within the building industry. Further, the paper provides insights into how the NZ building industry can transform its performance through innovation.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: acceleration; emerging technologies; innovation; New Zealand; productivity
Index terms: strategy, reasoning, interpretivism, focus group, data analysis, thematic analysis, practitioner, regulation, positivism, evidence, productivity, adaptation, efficiency, support mechanism, New Zealand, case study, industry performance, acceleration, empirical study, emerging technology, best practice, building industry, government policy, sampling
Subjects: public policy, data analysis and analytics, innovation and technology management, organization, user focus, business, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, practitioner, cognitive psychology, project controls, political science, financial analysis, philosophical concept, industry analysis, performance management, research methods, management, theoretical framing, methods and analysis, Geography
Topics: Time Control, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Quality Management, Roles and Professions, Governance, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here