Etemadi, R; Hon, C K H; Manley, K and Murphy, G (2022) Mechanisms for enhancing the use of social media for knowledge sharing by the construction professionals. Construction Innovation, 22(2), pp. 284-304. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to investigate the mechanisms for transforming construction professionals' intentions into use of social media (SM) for knowledge sharing (KS). The objectives are to: identify the common types of SM platforms used by the construction professionals for KS; identify the key problems influencing transformation of the construction professionals' intentions into use of SM for KS; identify the factors mitigating the problems; and provide recommendations for enhancing construction professionals' use of SM for KS. Design/methodology/approach: The data was collected through semi-structured interviews with Australian construction professionals and analysed using grounded theory (GT). The outcomes of the analyses formed a framework for the enhancement of SM use for KS. Findings: The findings show that private SM followed by enterprise SM are more appealing to the construction professionals for KS compared to public SM; and uncertainties about users' privacy/confidentiality and the quality of the shared knowledge adversely affect the transformation of the construction professionals' intentions into use of SM for KS. Three types of trust are identified as the mitigators of the identified problems. A framework is proffered to enhance SM use for KS by construction professionals. Originality/value: This paper contributes to the construction literature by developing a GT to explain the factors which impact the transformation of the construction professionals' intentions into use of SM for KS. Additionally, the practical contribution of this study is the provision of framework constituting recommendations for the enhancement of SM use for KS.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction professionals; knowledge management; knowledge sharing; social media; trust; uncertainties |
| Index terms: | grounded theory, transformation, platform, construction professional, social media, knowledge sharing, interview, knowledge management, methodology, privacy, confidentiality |
| Subjects: | knowledge management, technology adoption, business, data collection methods, professional ethics, digital design, professional development, research methods, theoretical framing |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Legal Issues, Information Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here