Offsite construction skills evolution: An Australian case study

Ginigaddara, B; Perera, S; Feng, Y and Rahnamayiezekavat, P (2022) Offsite construction skills evolution: An Australian case study. Construction Innovation, 22(1), pp. 41-56. ISSN 1471-4175

Abstract

The construction industry is currently responding to pressures of industrialisation happening across all sectors. Consequently, offsite construction (OSC) has become a vehicle to achieve industrialisation. This requires changes in traditional construction processes resulting in possible changes in construction skill requirements. Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to identify and review prevailing OSC practices and skills in the Australian construction industry. This study aims to critically analyse the existing skill profile classifications through a single case study and identify the need for an OSC specific skill classification. This study follows a case study design, with an in-depth analysis of a single construction project. Only one case study was studied because scientifically, one example was enough to prove that the prevailing skill classifications do not represent OSC skills in a modern context. Data was retrospectively collected through semi-structured interviews of project stakeholders representing design, manufacture and assembly. Content analysis was conducted to analyse the collected data and produce findings. This study identifies the inadequacy of the existing classification system, unavailability and the need of OSC specific skill categorisation. It highlights new skills that enter OSC; building information modelling engineer, three-dimensional draftsperson, OSC project manager and project coordinator, which are not identified in the available Australian skill classifications. These, together with existing skills need to be carved in to create a new skill classification. This study is the first of its kind where a comprehensive OSC project is evaluated as a case study to determine OSC skill classification requirements in Australia.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Australia; case study; open manufacturing; offsite construction; skill categories
Index terms: construction industry, skill category, engineer, Australia, building information modelling, traditional construction, project manager, case study, open manufacturing, construction project, evolution, project stakeholder, content analysis, industrialization, interview
Subjects: heritage and conservation, industry analysis, information systems, sociology, production management, Geography, professional development, manufacturing engineering, economic development, data analysis and analytics, environmental science, data collection methods, profession
Topics: Digital Applications, Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here