Mock, B and O'Connor, J (2022) Taxonomic categories for commissioning and startup hot spot strategies. Construction Innovation, 22(1), pp. 120-140. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to better understand distinct solution strategy types for common commissioning and startup problems (Hot Spots) in the construction of industrial facilities. The authors also sought to better understand which solution strategy types offer the best value for the effort required. The authors used a method of qualitative coding of text-based data to identify themes, patterns and trends from a collection of 178 commissioning and startup (CSU) solution strategies for the CSU Hot Spots. Coding categories emerged after multiple iterations. The authors also mapped high-value, low-effort solution strategies across the categories. Chi-squared testing and analysis of proportion statistics help quantitatively justify this qualitative research. The authors identified 12 distinct coding categories and showed that they follow a non-uniform distribution via statistical testing. Those strategy types which provide particularly good value for the effort required are identified (such as quality assurance and control strategies), as well as those strategy types that do not. Research is limited to CSU for the construction of industrial facilities. The findings are also limited to a subset of the most commonly problematic CSU activities. Many findings may be beneficial for heavy civil and commercial CSU as well. Practical implications: Coding categories, definitions and descriptions provide a good overview of all 178 solution strategies for CSU project professionals. Implementing certain types of solutions or solution programs may allow CSU managers to prevent multiple Hot Spots from becoming problematic or to keep problems already occurring from becoming worse. Managers will also benefit from knowledge about which strategy types are more likely to give a higher value for lower effort. Qualitative coding and analysis of solution strategies for common CSU problems have never been conducted so rigorously in any other CSU study. This method has yielded results distinct from other CSU studies which have used quantitative methods. Insights from findings have advanced the body of knowledge surrounding problem-solving in the commissioning and startup sub-discipline.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | commissioning; high-value; low-effort strategies; industrial construction; qualitative coding; solution strategies |
| Index terms: | low-effort strategy, quantitative method, commissioning, qualitative research, program, body of knowledge, high-value, manager, quality assurance, strategy, hot spot, startup, best value, testing, industrial construction, statistics, becoming, qualitative coding |
| Subjects: | software systems, management, building construction, completion, quality assurance, philosophical process, research design and methodology, business, mathematical modelling, practitioner, economic analysis, knowledge management, data analysis and analytics, environmental science, bidding, professional practice |
| Topics: | Procurement, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Quality Management, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here