Assessing the importance of transformational leadership competencies and supply chain learning to green innovation: Construction practitioners' perspectives

Pham, H; Pham, T and Dang, C N (2022) Assessing the importance of transformational leadership competencies and supply chain learning to green innovation: Construction practitioners' perspectives. Construction Innovation, 22(4), pp. 1138-1154. ISSN 1471-4175

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to assess the importance of transformational leadership competencies, as well as supply chain learning, to green innovation in construction at the supply chain level. Design/methodology/approach: A questionnaire survey is conducted to collect data from construction firms in Vietnam. Many statistical analysis methods – including the Shapiro-Wilk test, one-sample Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Kruskal-Wallis test – are performed to achieve the research objectives. Findings: The results indicate that the importance of most transformational leadership competencies is similarly perceived among different role groups (i.e. directors/deputy directors, project managers, consultants, quantity surveyors and designers). Research limitations/implications: This study enriches the understanding of leadership research in construction at the supply chain level and also develops a theoretical framework for theory testing research, where the relationships of transformational leadership competencies and supply chain learning with green innovation are highlighted. Originality/value: Research on leadership in the green supply chain context is still limited, especially in the construction industry. Thus, this study is conducted to fill this gap of research.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction; construction management; green innovation; innovation; project management; quantity surveying; supply chain learning; supply chain management; sustainability and green buildings; transformational leadership
Index terms: green building, questionnaire, methodology, surveying, Vietnam, construction practitioner, survey, construction firm, project management, transformational leadership, testing, construction industry, project manager, quantity surveying, statistical analysis, designer
Subjects: health monitoring assessment and metrics, professional practice, data science, organization, data collection methods, profession, industry analysis, professional development, project management theory and practice, Geography, research methods, management, design practice
Topics: Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Roles and Professions, Design Practice, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here