Design process innovation on brock commons tallwood house

Poirier, E; Staub-French, S; Pilon, A; Fallahi, A; Teshnizi, Z; Tannert, T and Froese, T (2022) Design process innovation on brock commons tallwood house. Construction Innovation, 22(1), pp. 23-40. ISSN 1471-4175

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to study the design process innovations that enabled the successful delivery of a hybrid, mass-timber high-rise building in Canada, the Brock Commons Tallwood House at the University of British Columbia. It is one of a set of papers examining the project, including companion papers that describe innovations used during the mass timber construction process and the impact of these innovations on construction performance. A mixed-method, longitudinal case study approach was used in this research project to investigate and document the Tallwood House project over a three-year period. Both quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis techniques were used. Graduate student researchers were embedded within the project team to observe meetings and decision-making and to conduct periodic interviews. The research highlights a case of a balanced triple-helix system that provided a context for the successful "clustering” of product and process innovation, which were developed and implemented to flow throughout the project's lifecycle and across its supply chain to provide benefits at each stage. Four significant process-based innovations were implemented at the design phase of the building project to support radical product innovation: an integrated design process, virtual design and construction, designing for manufacturing and assembling and a rigorous quality control and quality assurance process. The product innovations developed through these process innovations were the structural system and the prefabricated envelope system. The context of innovation was seen to allow this "clustering", which is believed to be a key condition of success and enabled the efficient and successful delivery of the project. Generally, the approach was successful; however, some factors including the number of stakeholders and good-faith collaboration may limit the replicability of these strategies. This paper presents an in-depth investigation into the instantiation of an innovation system, identified as a balanced triple-helix system, which enabled and facilitated the design and decision-making process for a radical product innovation. Moreover, this paper describes the deployment of a cluster of process innovations that flowed throughout the project's lifecycle and across the project supply chain. This was seen as a key factor in ensuring the successful delivery of the project.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: design for manufacturing and assembly; integrated design process; mass timber; quality control quality assurance; tall wood; virtual design and construction
Index terms: investigation, lifecycle, design phase, clustering, quality control, virtual design and construction, project team, integrated design process, case study, product innovation, construction performance, decision-making process, Canada, collaboration, decision-making, construction process, high-rise building, mass timber, graduate student, commons, innovation system, interview, design process, strategy, tall wood, quality assurance
Subjects: design methods, innovation studies, business, construction type, data collection methods, project delivery, property law, data science, performance assessment, professional practice, building materials, curriculum design, design process, digital design, Geography, management, quality assurance, decision analysis, building construction
Topics: Organizational Design, Site Management, Education, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Legal Issues, Design Practice, Construction Technology, Risk Management, Construction Materials, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here