Construction process innovation on brock commons tallwood house

Staub-French, S; Pilon, A; Poirier, E; Fallahi, A; Kasbar, M; Calderon, F; Teshnizi, Z and Froese, T (2022) Construction process innovation on brock commons tallwood house. Construction Innovation, 22(1), pp. 1-22. ISSN 1471-4175

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present the construction process innovations that enabled the successful delivery of the hybrid mass timber high-rise building in Canada, the Brock Commons Tallwood House at the University of British Columbia. It is one of a set of papers examining the project, including companion papers that describe innovations in the mass timber design process and the impact of these innovations on construction performance. The focus of this paper is on innovation in the construction phase and its relationship to innovations implemented in previous project phases. A mixed-method, longitudinal case study approach was used in this research project to investigate and document the Tallwood House project over a three-year period. Both quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis techniques were used. Members of the research team observed prefabrication and construction, conducted periodic interviews and reviewed project artefacts. The research identified three innovation "clusters", including the use of innovative tools, techniques and strategies in the design and construction processes and the role they played in delivering the project. The clusters were further characterized according to the type of connectivity they afforded, either facilitation, operationalization or materialization. These two perspectives support a compounding view on innovation and help to understand how it can flow throughout a project's life cycle and across its supply chain. Three process-based innovations were initiated during the design phase, integrated design process, building information modeling and virtual design and construction and flowed through to the construction phase. These were seen to enable the creation of connections that were crucial to the overall success of the project. These innovations were operationalized and enacted through the construction phase as design for manufacturing and assembly and prefabrication, staged construction and just-in-time delivery, integration of safety and risk management and a rigorous quality control and quality assurance process. Finally, a full-scale mock-up was produced for practice and constructability assessment, materializing the radical product innovation that was the mass timber structure. These strategies are used together for a synergistic and integrated approach to increase productivity, expedite the construction schedule and develop an innovative building product. This paper details an in-depth investigation into the diffusion dynamics of multiple systemic innovations for the construction process of a unique building project, the tools and techniques used by the construction manager and team, and the challenges, solutions and lessons learned.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: just-in-time delivery; mass timber; prefabrication; quality assurance; quality control; staged construction; tall wood; virtual design and construction
Index terms: product innovation, case study, building information modelling, Canada, life cycle, productivity, construction performance, design phase, design and construction, risk management, investigation, dynamics, integrated design process, virtual design and construction, systemic innovation, quality control, prefabrication, constructability, construction phase, design process, connectivity, integrated approach, interview, quality assurance, tall wood, strategy, construction manager, artefact, just-in-time, construction process, integration, staged construction, commons, lessons learned, mass timber, high-rise building
Subjects: information systems, quality assurance, systems engineering, organizational analysis, networking, building construction, sociology, lean logistics, Geography, professional development, design process, digital design, management, construction integration, performance assessment, professional practice, contractual arrangements, property law, project delivery, building materials, strategic site management, innovation studies, design methods, value management, data collection methods, profession, risk assessment, construction type
Topics: Construction Technology, Procurement, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Construction Materials, Business Strategy, Site Management, Organizational Design, Quality Management, Supply Chain Management, Design Practice, Legal Issues, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here